Searching, assessment, and screening system for safer alternative chemicals, GreenN (Green Next)
| Assessment Type | Carcinogenicity | Mutagenicity | Reproductive Toxicity | Developmental Toxicity | Endocrine Disruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity - Single Dose | Systemic Toxicity - Repeated Dose | Neurotoxicity - Single Dose | Skin Sensitization | Respiratory Sensitization | Skin Irritation | Eye Irritation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
Very High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Aquatic Toxicity | Chronic Aquatic Toxicity |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Persistence | Bioaccumulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Reactivity | Flammability |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Medium |
Insufficient data
|
The Hazard Diagnostic Module consists of the following four computational chemistry methods. The predicted toxicity alerts are for reference only and should be evaluated together with other available data.
| SMARTS Pattern | Endpoint | Source | Author | Journal Reference |
|---|
| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point |
101.111 °C
As reported: 214 °F at 760 mmHg (USCG, 1999)
Other sources (1)
|
CAMEO Chemicals |
| Melting Point |
-15.6111 °C
As reported: 3.9 °F (USCG, 1999)
Other sources (3)
|
CAMEO Chemicals |
| Vapor Pressure | Esentially zero. | Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) |
| Solubility |
86.9 g/ 100 ml
Other sources (4)
|
DrugBank |
| Density |
2.71 g·cm⁻³
As reported: 2.71 g/cm³
Other sources (4)
|
ILO-WHO International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSCs) |
Source: PubChem
Safer alternatives are referenced from current safer chemical databases and software logic, divided into the following three categories:
Based on substructure, the system lists chemicals with risk levels 3 (usable but safer alternatives may be sought), 4 (safer chemicals), or insufficient data (U: not enough data to determine risk level). Information
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Notes |
|---|
Real-world substitution cases involving this chemical, from the SUBSPORT+ case story database (English records).
| Case | Role of this chemical | Alternative | Sector | Function | Implementation | Reason for substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative to lead acetate in sugar cane and sugar beet analyses | Used as alternative |
|
Manufacture of food products Scientific research and development | Solids separation (precipitating) agent | In use — France | skin/respiratory sensitizing ecotoxicity other toxic effects |
| Alternatives for accelerating admixtures for sprayed concrete | Used as alternative |
|
Building and construction work | Other | In use | other toxic effects |
Full list of OECD SAAT case studies (not filtered by chemical).
| Case Study Name | Link | Publish Date | Publishing Organization | Related Products | Description |
|---|