Searching, assessment, and screening system for safter alternative chemicals, SAS
| Assessment Type | Carcinogenicity | Mutagenicity | Reproductive Toxicity | Developmental Toxicity | Endocrine Disruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
High |
Medium |
High |
High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity - Single Dose | Systemic Toxicity - Repeated Dose | Neurotoxicity - Single Dose | Skin Sensitization | Respiratory Sensitization | Skin Irritation | Eye Irritation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Medium |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Acute Aquatic Toxicity | Chronic Aquatic Toxicity |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
High |
| Assessment Type | Persistence | Bioaccumulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Reactivity | Flammability |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
The Hazard Diagnostic Module consists of the following four computational chemistry methods. The predicted toxicity alerts are for reference only and should be evaluated together with other available data.
| Smarts | Endpoint | Source | Author | Journal |
|---|
Safer alternatives are referenced from current safer chemical databases and software logic, divided into the following three categories:
Based on substructure, the system lists chemicals with risk levels 3 (usable but safer alternatives may be sought), 4 (safer chemicals), or insufficient data (U: not enough data to determine risk level). Information
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Notes |
|---|
Real-world substitution cases involving this chemical, from the SUBSPORT+ case story database (English records).
| Case | Role of this chemical | Alternative | Sector | Function | Implementation | Reason for substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substitution of a naphtha-based solvent in the cleaning of printing rolls | Substituted |
|
Printing and reproduction of recorded media | Solvent | Full capacity — 2008 in Spain | CMR |
| Chemical treatment of rubber, wood, leather or metal which protects, preserves and renews the surface of the material. An alternative to carbon black. | Used as alternative |
|
Manufacture of rubber products Manufacture of basic metals, including alloys Building and construction work General manufacturing, e.g. machinery, equipment, vehicles, other transport equipment Manufacture of bulk, large scale chemicals (including petroleum products) Manufacture of textiles, leather, fur Manufacture of wood and wood products Manufacture of furniture | UV stabilizer | Pilot study | CMR physical hazards |
| Liquefied gases as alternative to glycol containing fluids used in fog machines | Substituted |
|
Other | Other | In use | other toxic effects |
Full list of OECD SAAT case studies (not filtered by chemical).
| Case Study Name | Link | Publish Date | Publishing Organization | Related Products | Description |
|---|