Searching, assessment, and screening system for safter alternative chemicals, SAS
| Assessment Type | Carcinogenicity | Mutagenicity | Reproductive Toxicity | Developmental Toxicity | Endocrine Disruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
High |
High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity - Single Dose | Systemic Toxicity - Repeated Dose | Neurotoxicity - Single Dose | Skin Sensitization | Respiratory Sensitization | Skin Irritation | Eye Irritation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
Insufficient data
|
Very High |
Very High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Aquatic Toxicity | Chronic Aquatic Toxicity |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Very High |
| Assessment Type | Persistence | Bioaccumulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Reactivity | Flammability |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
The Hazard Diagnostic Module consists of the following four computational chemistry methods. The predicted toxicity alerts are for reference only and should be evaluated together with other available data.
| Smarts | Endpoint | Source | Author | Journal |
|---|
Safer alternatives are referenced from current safer chemical databases and software logic, divided into the following three categories:
Based on substructure, the system lists chemicals with risk levels 3 (usable but safer alternatives may be sought), 4 (safer chemicals), or insufficient data (U: not enough data to determine risk level). Information
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Notes |
|---|
Real-world substitution cases involving this chemical, from the SUBSPORT+ case story database (English records).
| Case | Role of this chemical | Alternative | Sector | Function | Implementation | Reason for substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substitution of allergenic preservatives: methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone | Substituted |
|
Manufacture of bulk, large scale chemicals (including petroleum products) Manufacture of fine chemicals | Biocide | Pilot study — Denmark | other reasons |
| Skin care products without preservatives, using “active packaging” | Substituted | Non-chemical alternative The process for manufacturing and packaging of the products, as well as the type of package has been developed to eliminate the need for preservatives. | Health services Other | Fragrance pH regulating agent UV stabilizer | Full capacity — 1970´s, Sweden | other toxic effects ecotoxicity skin/respiratory sensitizing |
Full list of OECD SAAT case studies (not filtered by chemical).
| Case Study Name | Link | Publish Date | Publishing Organization | Related Products | Description |
|---|