Searching, assessment, and screening system for safter alternative chemicals, SAS
| Assessment Type | Carcinogenicity | Mutagenicity | Reproductive Toxicity | Developmental Toxicity | Endocrine Disruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Acute Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity - Single Dose | Systemic Toxicity - Repeated Dose | Neurotoxicity - Single Dose | Skin Sensitization | Respiratory Sensitization | Skin Irritation | Eye Irritation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
| Assessment Type | Acute Aquatic Toxicity | Chronic Aquatic Toxicity |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Persistence | Bioaccumulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Reactivity | Flammability |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
The Hazard Diagnostic Module consists of the following four computational chemistry methods. The predicted toxicity alerts are for reference only and should be evaluated together with other available data.
| Smarts | Endpoint | Source | Author | Journal |
|---|
Safer alternatives are referenced from current safer chemical databases and software logic, divided into the following three categories:
Based on substructure, the system lists chemicals with risk levels 3 (usable but safer alternatives may be sought), 4 (safer chemicals), or insufficient data (U: not enough data to determine risk level). Information
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Notes |
|---|
Real-world substitution cases involving this chemical, from the SUBSPORT+ case story database (English records).
| Case | Role of this chemical | Alternative | Sector | Function | Implementation | Reason for substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formaldehyde free preservative for starch adhesives | Used as alternative |
|
Printing and reproduction of recorded media Manufacture of bulk, large scale chemicals (including petroleum products) Manufacture of furniture Building and construction work | Durability agent | In use — USA | CMR sensitizing |
| Alternative to sodium chloride used for de-icing of roads. | Substituted |
|
Agriculture, forestry, fishery Other | Other | Pilot study — 2011, Denmark | other toxic effects |
| Environmental-friendly snow removal | Substituted |
|
Other | Other | In use — 2007 in De, A | |
| Electrochemical activation of saline aqueous solution as source for alternative disinfectant in Moscow hospital | Used as alternative |
|
Other | Cleaning agent | In use — Russia | skin/respiratory sensitizing ecotoxicity |
| Leather treatment with a natural tanning agent made from olive leaves | Substituted |
|
Manufacture of textiles, leather, fur | Other | In use | CMR other reasons |
Full list of OECD SAAT case studies (not filtered by chemical).
| Case Study Name | Link | Publish Date | Publishing Organization | Related Products | Description |
|---|