Searching, assessment, and screening system for safer alternative chemicals, GreenN (Green Next)
| Assessment Type | Carcinogenicity | Mutagenicity | Reproductive Toxicity | Developmental Toxicity | Endocrine Disruption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
High |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Acute Toxicity | Systemic Toxicity - Single Dose | Systemic Toxicity - Repeated Dose | Neurotoxicity - Single Dose | Skin Sensitization | Respiratory Sensitization | Skin Irritation | Eye Irritation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Medium |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
High |
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Acute Aquatic Toxicity | Chronic Aquatic Toxicity |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Persistence | Bioaccumulation |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Very High |
Insufficient data
|
| Assessment Type | Reactivity | Flammability |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard Assessment Level |
Insufficient data
|
Insufficient data
|
The Hazard Diagnostic Module consists of the following four computational chemistry methods. The predicted toxicity alerts are for reference only and should be evaluated together with other available data.
| SMARTS Pattern | Endpoint | Source | Author | Journal Reference |
|---|
| Property | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Boiling Point |
104 °C
Other sources (3)
|
ILO-WHO International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSCs) |
| Melting Point |
Decomposes (NIOSH, 2024)
Other sources (2)
|
CAMEO Chemicals |
| Vapor Pressure | Vapor pressure, kPa at 20 °C: 2.4 | ILO-WHO International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSCs) |
| Solubility |
29 % (NIOSH, 2024)
Other sources (2)
|
CAMEO Chemicals |
| Density |
1.34 g·cm⁻³
As reported: Relative density (water = 1): 1.34
Other sources (4)
|
ILO-WHO International Chemical Safety Cards (ICSCs) |
Source: PubChem
Safer alternatives are referenced from current safer chemical databases and software logic, divided into the following three categories:
Based on substructure, the system lists chemicals with risk levels 3 (usable but safer alternatives may be sought), 4 (safer chemicals), or insufficient data (U: not enough data to determine risk level). Information
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Risk Level | Data Source | Notes |
|---|
| Name | CAS | Industrial Use | Safety | Notes |
|---|
Real-world substitution cases involving this chemical, from the SUBSPORT+ case story database (English records).
| Case | Role of this chemical | Alternative | Sector | Function | Implementation | Reason for substitution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to hydrazine in anticorrosion treatment for boilers | Used as alternative |
|
Electricity, steam, gas water supply and sewage treatment | Aerating and dearating agents Corrosion inhibitor Deodorizer Reducing agent | In use — France | CMR skin/respiratory sensitizing |
Full list of OECD SAAT case studies (not filtered by chemical).
| Case Study Name | Link | Publish Date | Publishing Organization | Related Products | Description |
|---|